Human rights capital punishment essays

• Home /
• Essay /
• Human rights capital punishment essays

British Broadcasting Corporation Home.

A breakdown of the arguments given in favour of abolishing or against reintroducing the death human rights capital. Everyone thinks human life is valuable. Some of those against capital punishment believe that human life is essays valuable capital punishment even the worst murderers human rights not be deprived of the value of their lives.

They believe that the value of the offender's life cannot be destroyed by the offender's bad conduct - even if they punishment essays killed someone. Some abolitionists don't go that far.

Arguments against capital punishment

They say that life should be preserved unless there source a very good reason not to, and that the those who are in favour of capital punishment are the ones who have to justify their /english-grammar-essays-pdf.html Everyone has an inalienable human right to life, even those who commit murder; sentencing a person to just click for source and executing them violates that right.

This is very similar to the 'value of life' argument, but approached from the perspective of human rights. The counter-argument is that a person can, by their actions, forfeit human rights, and that murderers forfeit their right to life. Another example will make this clear - a punishment essays forfeits their right to human rights capital punishment essays if they start a murderous attack and the only way the victim can save their own human rights capital punishment essays is by killing the attacker.

Therefore if any man is dangerous to the community and is subverting it by some sin, the treatment to human rights capital punishment essays commended is his execution in order to preserve the common good Therefore to kill a man who retains his natural worthiness is intrinsically evil, although it may be justifiable to kill a sinner just as it is to kill a beast, for, as Aristotle points out, an evil man is worse than a beast and more harmful.

Aquinas is saying that certain contexts change a human rights capital punishment essays act killing into a punishment essays act killing to repair the human rights capital of justice done by the person killed, and killing a person who has forfeited their natural worthiness by killing. The most common and most cogent argument against capital punishment is that sooner or punishment essays, innocent people will get killed, because of mistakes or flaws in the justice system.

Witnesses, where they are part of the processprosecutors and jurors can all make mistakes. When this is coupled with flaws in the system it is inevitable that innocent people will be convicted of crimes.

BBC - Ethics - Capital punishment: Arguments against capital punishment

Where capital punishment is used such mistakes cannot be put right. The death penalty legitimizes an irreversible act of violence by the state and will inevitably claim innocent victims.

As long as human justice remains fallible, the risk of executing the innocent can never punishment human rights capital punishment essays eliminated.